Image Journal runs a good article every once in a while. Their latest, a short look at Rene Girard, is stupendous.
Contrary to the going rhetoric of the day, we don’t really want to be individuals. We want to be swarms.
Contrary to the going rhetoric of the day, we don’t really want to be individuals. We want to be swarms.
Dawkins is aware that evolution is commonly called a theory but deems “theory” too wishy-washy a term because it connotes the idea of hypothesis. Evolution, in Dawkins’s view, is a concept as bulletproof as a mathematical theorem, even though it can’t be proved by rigorous logical proofs. He seems to have little appreciation for the cognitive structure of science. Philosophers of science, who are the arbiters of such issues, say science consists largely of facts, laws and theories. The facts are the facts, the laws summarize the regularities in the facts, and the theories explain the laws. Evolution can fall into only one of these categories, and it’s a theory.